What's your favorite Video editing program?

Chat and discussion not related to either Marathon or Aleph One. Please keep things at least mildly interesting, though.
Post Reply
User avatar
TectonInd
Mjolnir Mark IV
Posts: 383
Joined: Apr 17th '10, 03:48
Contact:

I'm thinking about getting into film and Machinima and bringing my Youtube account back to life.

So what video editing program do you use?
Last edited by TectonInd on Jul 11th '10, 14:43, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
irons
Vidmaster
Posts: 2651
Joined: Mar 1st '06, 20:44
Location: (.Y.)
Contact:

Minotaur.
underworld : simple fun netmaps // prahblum peack : simple rejected netmaps
azure dreams : simple horrible netmaps // v6.0!!!: thomas mann's greatest hits : simple simple netmaps
User avatar
TectonInd
Mjolnir Mark IV
Posts: 383
Joined: Apr 17th '10, 03:48
Contact:

irons wrote:Minotaur.
CAN I GET A LEGIT ANSWER
User avatar
ukimalefu
Mjolnir Mark IV
Posts: 652
Joined: Aug 21st '08, 17:25
Contact:

iMovie
User avatar
ray
Cyborg
Posts: 212
Joined: Nov 10th '09, 02:59
Contact:

GRAVE GRID
Image
User avatar
Zott
Vidmaster
Posts: 1666
Joined: Jul 1st '06, 21:14
Location: Earth
Contact:

{All of these are for the Windows Platfom}

Well, Premiere Elements 3 was a really good and full-fledged consumer product. But I believe it has trouble with Vista IIRC (probably Windows 7 too). If you can find it, and don't mind slightly older technology, I'd go with that. [Since Premiere Elements version 4 ran poorly for me, and I didn't really like version 7's new interface.]

I'd also recommend CS3 of Premiere if you want a suite of programs, such as After Effects. As for CS4 Premiere, It also seemed to run slower than CS3 Premiere, and its features didn't win me over. CS5 I can't really comment on, since I haven't used it much, though it seems to perform better than CS4, though I still don't really use the new features for it. [Note the hardware used has changed through my experience with these programs, so they are not set on a standard basis of performance]

I've hated all the Ulead products I've used though it has been more than 4 years since I've touched one of their products, so unless it is Oregon Trail #, it is probably completely different than the dodgy interface/constant 10 minute crashes I faced.

Windows Live Movie Maker is good for basic stuff, and Windows Movie Maker that ships with Vista and below is probably better, but still basic. If you don't really care about layering video clips, then those should be fine for everything that you need to do.


My Conclusion: Download a Trial of each program and see which one you like the best. Windows Live Movie Maker is Free, though the rest are pricier. Therefore, don't buy until you see if you like it or not. Don't be caught with a horrible video editor, you will be spending a lot of time with it. (And more time with headaches if you hate it) Remember, it isn't the editing program that defines the video unless there are features that are demanded. Therefore, even the most basic program could be good depending on your needs. (Just don't put the default Blue Background of title slides from Windows Movie Maker on Youtube.....EVER)
Last edited by Zott on Jul 12th '10, 04:02, edited 1 time in total.
Video Gamer Blog (With some articles by me!)

Look at Him Go, Weeee
User avatar
TBCR
Mjolnir Mark IV
Posts: 383
Joined: May 22nd '10, 14:26
Location: Raleigh,NC
Contact:

i use Virtual Dub, Cause i Dont like to Go "Fancy Schmancy"(As My sister Would Call It)
Marathon Speedrun Times: Discord
M1A1 - 26:44 - PB
M2 - 33:52 - PB
M2 - XBLA - 33:00 - PB
M2 - Coop with ApertureGrillz - 27:17 IGT/29:09 RTA - WR
MInf - 13:22 - PB
Minf all main levels - 27:49 - PB
Twitch
User avatar
The Thug
Vidmaster
Posts: 1014
Joined: Jul 9th '07, 22:20
Contact:

MonkeyJam for stop motion. In the rare occurrence of live video, I use WINDOWS MOVIE MAKER.
Childhood is not a race. It's a journey.
User avatar
TectonInd
Mjolnir Mark IV
Posts: 383
Joined: Apr 17th '10, 03:48
Contact:

Zott wrote:I'd also recommend CS3 of Premiere if you want a suite of programs, such as After Effects. As for CS4 Premiere, It also seemed to run slower than CS3 Premiere, and its features didn't win me over. CS5 I can't really comment on, since I haven't used it much, though it seems to perform better than CS4, though I still don't really use the new features for it. [Note the hardware used has changed through my experience with these programs, so they are not set on a standard basis of performance]
Thanks, I tried premiere, and it's great! I might buy CS3, because it looks like it has some really good apps (FLASH :D), but I'm not sure because of the exorbitant costs. I just wish I could run a better version, but I only have 1 gig of ram and a Celeron processor, so I'm a bit limited :P
User avatar
treellama
Vidmaster
Posts: 6110
Joined: Jun 2nd '06, 02:05
Location: Pittsburgh
Contact:

TectonInd wrote:Thanks, I tried premiere, and it's great! I might buy CS3, because it looks like it has some really good apps (FLASH :D), but I'm not sure because of the exorbitant costs. I just wish I could run a better version, but I only have 1 gig of ram and a Celeron processor, so I'm a bit limited :P
4 GB of RAM is less than $100, why would you consider buying CS3 but not that?
User avatar
TectonInd
Mjolnir Mark IV
Posts: 383
Joined: Apr 17th '10, 03:48
Contact:

Treellama wrote:4 GB of RAM is less than $100, why would you consider buying CS3 but not that?
Good point.

Now I feel stupid
Post Reply